Court acquits ex-NDDC’s Omatsuli, Momoh, others from money laundering charge

2026-03-03 - 18:07

A Federal High Court presided over by Justice Daniel Osiagor on Tuesday discharged and acquitted former executive director of Projects, Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) Engr Tuoyo Omatsuli, Francis Momoh and two other defendants from the criminal charge of money laundering filed against them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). Delivery the voluminous judgement in the Suit between FRN and Engr Tuoyo Omatsuli and others, Justice Osiagor held that the prosecution failed to establish the offence of proceeds of unlawful activity and money laundering against the 1st and 2nd defendants. He said that from the evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses , the defendants were not culpable in the 46 counts charge brought against them by EFCC. The Judge further held that the prosecution premised their investigation on credible intelligence whereas there was no petition against the defendants and failed to produce before the court credible evidence to sustain a credible intelligence. ” The prosecution has failed to establish the offence of money laundering, conspiracy, aiding and abetting against the defendants Consequently, 1st defendant Engr Tuoyo Omatsuli, 2nd defendant Francis Momoh, 3rd and 4th defendants are hereby discharged and acquitted”, Justice Osiagor declared. This is the second time the court is discharging and acquitting the defendants, having been acquitted in 2020 after their first arraignment. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had re-arraigned a former Executive Director of Projects, Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), Tuoyo Omatsuli, and others for alleged N3.6 billion fraud. Mr Omatsuli and his co-defendants were re-arraigned before Justice Daniel of a Federal High Court sitting in Lagos Osiagor on a 46 counts charge of money laundering . The anti-graft is prosecuting Mr Omatsuli alongside Francis Momoh, Don Parker Properties Limited, and Building Associates Limited, on money laundering charges under various provisions, including Section 18 of the Money Laundering Act as amended by Act No 1 of 2012 and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act. The provision criminalises conspiracy, aiding and abetting and money laundering. Section 15(3) of the same Act which prescrbes seven to 14 years imprisonment for an individual and a revocation of licence in the case of a corporate body. The defendants pleaded not guilty in all the charges The re-arraignment of the defendants followed the Court of Appeal’s reversal of their earlier acquittal handed down by the trial court. Omatsuli’s legal journey started in 2018 when he was arraigned before then Justice Saliu Saidu ( now retired) of a Federal High Court sitting in Lagos. The court dismissed the charges against the defendants, having upheld their no case submission in 2020. The trial court held that the defendants had no cause to enter defence when the prosecution, at the end of its evidence, failed to link the defendants to the alleged crimes. Dissatisfied with the ruling, EFCC went on appeal against it. The Court of Appeal upheld EFCC’s appeal, thus upturned the acquittal and ordered the trial to proceed to defence stage. But with the retirement of Justice Saudi, the trial has suffered setbacks since the Court of Appeal’s November 2022 judgement reversing the acquittal of the defendants. Following the retirement of Saidu, the matter was reassigned to the current trial judge, Justice Osiagor Daniel Osiagor where the defendants were re-arraignment. They maintained their no guilty plea. Fresh trial began and prosecution called 16 witnesses who had testified in the previous trial before the former judge. Thirty four (34) pieces of exhibits were admitted and marked Exhibits ET01 to ET34 during the trial. The prosecuting counsel, Mr Ekene Iheanacho (SAN), then applied to tender the records of the proceedings of the former trial, along with the exhibits admitted in evidence by the former judge. He cited Section 46 of the Evidence Act to support the move. He submitted that his request was predicated on the need to reduce further delay and expenses as earlier held by the court. The defence counsel did not oppose the application by the prosecution. The court ruled and admitted the records as well as the exhibits in evidence, which were marked ET 01 to ET 34. The prosecution counsel also applied to adopt the previous testimony of the 13th prosecution witness, Mr Adamu. He also applied that all the exhibits should be taken as read. The judge granted the prayer, as there was no objection by the defence team.